![]() |
PHYSICS 220/230
|
Introduction: In this experiment we will investigate and verify the random behavior of radioactive decay and determine the half-life of a radioactive isotope.
Background Theory: The nuclear decay process seems at the same time to be random yet predictable. How can a random event be predictable? This analogy may be helpful. Think about making popcorn. As you heat the kernels of corn, it would be very difficult to say exactly which kernel is going to explode next, yet it is fairly easy (simply by listening) to say how many kernels pop each second. In the same way, it is impossible to say which unstable nucleus will be the next one to decay; however, it is fairly easy to use a Geiger-Müller (GM) detector to count the number of nuclei which do decay each second throughout a radioactive sample (this is called the "decay rate" of the sample).
If you "listened" to the nuclear decay of a radioactive sample with a good GM detector and plotted counts per second over a period of time, what would the results look like? Well, that depends on how long a period of time you are talking about. For radioactive samples, the important time is the half-life, which is the time for half of the current number of unstable nuclei to decay. Over a time interval very short compared to the half-life, a very small fraction of the current number of nuclei would decay each second during that interval. Thus, the number of unstable nuclei can be considered almost constant over the interval, and the decay equation then tells us that the decay rate should also be almost constant over the interval. For example, say the half-life is a million years. Then, over the next few hours, the number of decays each second should be virtually constant. But because each decay happens independently of all others (i.e., decay is a random process), the actual number of counts will fluctuate up and down about this constant value, according to a well-tested theory of statistics. The size of the fluctuation depends on the value of the "constant" decay rate - the higher the rate, the smaller the fluctuations. In fact, the standard deviation should approach the square root of the mean decay rate.
Of course, the decay rate of any radioactive sample must eventually become smaller and smaller when monitored over a sufficiently long time interval; i.e., one comparable to or larger than the half-life. Using our previous example, we would expect the number of decays during the next second to be significantly higher than the number of decays during a second several hundred thousand years from now, and much higher than the number of decays during a second several million years from now. The mode of decay for all nuclei are tabulated in the Chart of Nuclides. For each of the nuclear reactions which you will be investigating, look up the parent nuclei in the Chart of Nuclides and write a few sentences about each reaction.
APPARATUS:
In this lab, you will use a computer-interfaced GM detector to monitor the decay rate of two different radioactive sources; each is an example of one of the situations discussed above.

.
Every time a decay product (such as an alpha or beta particle) flies out of the source and enters the detector through its window, a voltage signal is sent from the GM tube to an interface, and then on to the computer program which keeps a running tally of all such counts.
Initial Setup: You must read the Nuclear Safety Guides (in the back of your lab manual) before you begin the exercises.
Plug in the power cord for the GM detector and connect its phone jack to Channel 1 of the Science Workshop Interface box. Prepare the computer to record data.
Carefully remove the plastic protective cap from the window of the LabNet Geiger-Müller detector. Clamp the GM detector vertically so its bottom edge is about 5 cm above the tabletop.
Exercise 1: Radioactive Decay as a Random Event ( Tl204__>
Pb204 + e- )
Procedures:
Analysis: Theory says that radioactive decay obeys a statistics for which the standard deviation of the counts is equal to the square root of the mean for a large number of counts. For your data, compare the standard deviation to the square root of the mean.
Exercise 2: Background Radiation
We are always subject to radiation from natural sources in the universe. Cosmic rays as well as radioactive atoms in water, soils, and even our bodies all contribute to the background count. The background count rate must be determined and subtracted from all determinations of count rate to yield the corrected count rate.
Procedures:
|
Background Count Rate (cts per 5 seconds) |
|
|
Beta Source Count Rate (cts per 5 seconds) |
|
Exercise 3: The Half-Life of a Radioactive Decay
( Cs137__>
Ba137m + e- ) and later ( Ba137m__>
Ba137 + g ),
which we will measure
Procedures:
Analysis:
|
y-coordinate at time t = 0 |
|
|
initial decay rate for sample - background rate |
|
|
1/2 initial decay rate + background rate |
|
|
Half-life determination |
|
|
1/4 initial decay rate + background rate |
|
|
Time at second half-life |
|
|
Half-life determination |
|
| Average Half-life |
Discussion:
1. How long will it take for Ba-137m to decay to 1/32nd of the original counts/second?
2. How do your measurements of the half-life of Barium-137m compare to the accepted value of 2.6 minutes?
3. Can you think of any way to reduce the time it takes for Barium-137m to decay to 1% of its original activity?
4. Does the time it takes to decay to 1% of its original activity depend on how much radioactive material there is to start with?