Why is JiTT potentially helpful?

 

Why is JiTT potentially NOT helpful?


We have been extremely encouraged by our FCI Results from 3 years of using JiTT and Physlets in College/University Physics.....

Traditional g = 0.25               More Interactive 0.38 < g <  0.68 (Hake, 1998)

....so why not advanced classes????  Assessment tools, like the FCI,  are just now being developed for advanced courses (for example, R. Robinett's QMVI).